Skip to main content

Conventional vs Experiential Learning for Toddlers

There is often a lot of debate on which style of learning is good for children. 

1. Conventional learning
2. Experiential learning
3. Balanced approach to learning

There are different schools who follow different approaches, parents subscribe to different ideologies, children take differently to the different approaches.
Let us first attempt to understand how the three ideologies work.

Conventional Learning

This is the style of learning which most of us have grown up with, and has been the accepted method of learning since long. More academic in nature, the idea has been to introduce concepts theoretically, and learning and executing theoretical problems in the classroom. 
The argument in favour of this approach is that especially in a country like ours, where a better lifestyle is fought for through competitive examinations, a conventional style of learning is crucial to ensure success later on.

Experiential Learning

This form of learning has picked up pace in recent years. It focuses on learning by experiencing, and then reflecting on those experiences. The idea is to reinforce real life concepts by doing them. Here the learner has a more active role in their own learning, as opposed to a passive approach in conventional learning.
The argument which sometimes goes against this mode of learning is that conventional learning outcomes like alphabet, or maths etc, sometimes get sidelined.

Balanced Approach

This approach attempts to blend elements of both the conventional and experiential learning methods. There is focus on both introducing concepts academically as well as focusing on extra curricular activities for holistic development.
In this approach, there may be some schools which are leaning more towards experiential, and some which are leaning more towards the conventional approach.

Where does Morning Glorie Stand?

Every child has a different approach to learning. Some lean more towards a bookish approach by choice, while some are more interested in exploring nature, or being physically active. However, that is something which takes time to discover.

For kids under 4 years of age, we believe that associating a concept with its actual execution is crucial. An alphabet when introduced is more important for a 2 year old because of the associated vocabulary which helps in language development. For a 4 year old, it is the phonic sound associated with the alphabet which helps develop reading as a skill. When circle is introduced as a shape, it gains relevance when the child is able to associate it with real life circular objects. Simple science experiments like capillary action are fun to do, and yet even a 3 year old can learn and actually recall the concept, because it is not just theoretical any more.
For children under 4 years of age, keeping their minds as well as bodies busy together is important. An association of any concept with their immediate surroundings is what we work on. 
That is the foundation of building any concept for them.
We follow this approach not only at our physical preschool in South City 1, Gurgaon but also during our online parent-toddler sessions. 



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Musings of a Pioneer: Playschool Learning for Toddlers (Part 2)

 …Till we were struck by a miniscule virus – the Covid 19. It is important for the child to continue to have the additional support in their most important brain development phase – the two to four-year-old age bracket – when the brain develops rapidly to almost 80 percent of a fully developed brain. It is important for the child to have external support to develop cognitive, linguistic, social, emotional, and motor skills. It is important for the toddler to be exposed to a peer group and caregivers other than parents, whom they could observe and imitate for holistic development to happen. It is important for the child to be in a more conducive environment at school where they could indulge in their favourite pastimes in a non-judgemental atmosphere. It is also important for the child to continue to have an environment where they can interact socially with their peer group. This environment is now being denied to the children of this age bracket of two to four years. Many young

Early Years Learning - Concrete vs Abstract

  "My child does not recognize certain alphabets" "My child tends to shy away whenever we have guests at home" "My child does not show interest in number recognition, but loves to mess around in sand" "My child loves to speak, but when I ask her to speak vocabulary with a particular alphabet, she goes silent" "My child understands shapes, but is unable to find them in his surroundings" Notice the difference in the implications of these statements - they represent some examples of the difference between what we call concrete vs abstract learning during the early years at Morning Glorie, play school in Gurgaon, and online homeschooling in India. All too often, we tend to focus on learning which can be measured, which is concrete. What we tend to forget is, every experience, new or repeated, is a learning - this is truer during the early years of life, though it is something to ponder on and incorporate in our own lives irrespective of age

Pushing Children Beyond Their Comfort Zone - Striking the Right Balance

My mother, who is also my partner at work (this may seem odd, but we do complement each other in our skillsets, this makes us a good team), takes some of the batches in our online homeschooling in India program. These are live and interactive sessions, where parent and child attend together and are part of small groups of children for guided learning sessions. She also handles communication with the parent body, something we have learned is a very crucial aspect - at times, it is our responsibility to give the right guidance to parents as much as addressing queries which they may have. So two instances happened in the last couple of months, where a concerned parent called us up to tell us that their child was only interested in some of the activities, which seemed more fun in nature, while they tended to either show disinterest, or run away from some of the other activities.  Their query to us had two dimensions -  1. Should the nature of activities be changed? 2. Were we pushing the c